NEWTOWN TOWNSHIP SYCAMORE STREET COMMITTEE
A Reconstruction Project of Newtown Township
100 MUNICIPAL DRIVE
NEWTOWN, PA
TUESDAY, APRIL 13, 2004
8:00 PM
Approval
of Minutes: Mr.
Merjeski made a motion to approve the minutes of April 13, 2004 with the
following corrections:
Ø
Michael
Piazza was present, and David Burns, Jr. was not present.
Ø
Old
Business, Item B: change “water” to
“rain”
Ø
New
Business, #2: change “cold” to “could”
Ø
New
Business, last paragraph: change “from
Tri-State” to “to Tri-State”; and change “Mr. Jirele suggested he” to “Mr.
Jirele suggested the Committee”
Mr. Tyrol seconded; the motion carried
unanimously.
Members
Present: Chairman Vince Lombardi; Members
John Nejman, Frank Tyrol, Melva Vittoriano, Shannon Wilson, Joe Merjeski; HARB
representative Terry McLean; Planning Commission Liaisons Beth Sanderlin,
Michael Piazza and Shawn Ward, Esq., Supervisor Tom Jirele
Members
Not Present: Member David Burns, Jr.; Rand
Jaslow, Borough Liaison; Barry Dinneen, Borough Representative.
Also
present: Nelson Shaffer representing Pennoni
Associates Inc.; John Paul Lautenschlager, Focus on Newtown - Courier Times; Robert
Bebon, Newtown Presbyterian Church; George Stockburger IV; George Stockburger
V; Tom McLearnon representing Chandler Hall.
Call to
Order: Chairman Lombardi called the
meeting to order at 8:04 PM.
Approval
of Minutes
Mr.
Merjeski made a motion to approve the minutes of March 9, 2004 with the
following corrections:
Ø
at
the bottom of page 2, change “contractor” to “consultant”
Ø
change
“stream bed” to “stream bank”.
Mr. Nejman seconded; the motion carried
unanimously.
Special
Announcements
Special
Announcements - None
Mr. Shaffer distributed the minutes from the recent meeting that
included representatives from the township, Sycamore Street Committee, JD
Morrissey, Pennoni and PennDOT, to discuss Bypass intersection
construction. He said that they are
close to coming to an agreement with Morrissey regarding road closings and that
it looked like the road would not be closed during construction at the Richboro/Sycamore/Bypass
intersections. He said they might have
the means to maintain traffic both ways.
Mr. Shaffer said the issue might be settled by the next committee
meeting, and that a final sign off would be needed from PennDOT.
B.
Progress of Newtown Artesian Water Company
Mr. Shaffer said that there was an unforeseen utility conflict, and
that the water company was relocating approximately 900 feet of water line;
about 240 feet has been relocated thus far.
He said that any road closures so far have been quite brief; Mr.
Merjeski noted that traffic seemed to be moving satisfactorily during the
construction. Mr. Shaffer said that
rain and rock has been slowing down the work a little, but that the water
company hopes to be finished by Friday, April 17th.
C.
Progress of Haines & Kibblehouse
Mr. Shaffer said that H & K is ready to begin; they will probably
start at the Bypass end, even if the water pipe installation was not quite
completed. He said they have working
with H & K on other issues, and have discussed the possibility of two work
shifts, night and day. Mr. Lombardi
distributed a picture of possible designs for the stone wall on Sycamore Street
near the Historic Presbyterian Church.
Mr. McLean said that HARB liked the darker stone wall pictured, but
preferred darker mortar that would match the stones and de-emphasize the
joints; the Committee agreed. Mr.
McLean said that HARB recommended slightly raised mortar joints, also known as
“buttered joints.”
Mr. Ward moved to accept HARB’s recommendation for the stone wall
design, as delineated above by Mr. McLean.
Mr. Merjeski seconded; the motion carried unanimously.
NEW BUSINESS: Presentation by James
Tambourino, Tri-State Engineers, re: stream bank restoration
James Tambourino and John Biano were present
from Tri-State. Mr. Biano said they had
completed the survey work and were beginning work on the design. He presented a PhotoPlan and schematic for
the Newtown Creek Stream Bank Restoration Project dated 4/13/04.
Mr. Biano presented two wall systems and distributed
illustrations of each:
1.
“MPC Block Wall System”:
This gravity wall would be comprised of large concrete blocks laid in
with a crane, each prefab block weighing approximately 2500 lb. each. The exposed wall would be 8’ high, with a
slope up to a guardrail before the sidewalk, and would sit 4’ deep into the
embankment. Mr. Biano said that color
could be added to the stone and noted that the wall should require no
maintenance.
The Committee consensus was to use the MPC Block Wall
System. Mr. Tambourino said there were
several sized stones available but he felt the larger blocks would withstand
higher water velocity; Mr. Wilson said he had worked with the larger blocks and
felt they worked better and lasted longer than the smaller blocks. Mr. Biano said that there were a variety of
available stone colors and textures; he will send information to Mr. Shaffer to
relay to Mr. McLean for HARB review and recommendations; available stone
textures are illustrated on the website www.modcon.com.
Mr. Biano said they were still considering how best to
deflect water with no negative effect, and they were attempting to keep the
wall within two parcels. Mr. Biano said
that they intend to move a gravel bar in the creek and install flow deflectors
in order to help keep the water flowing down the middle of the stream, thus
reducing bank erosion. Mr. Jirele asked
if there was any concern with sediment at the flow deflectors. Mr. Biano said that the deflectors were
quite low and should allow for a natural source of constant water flow. He said they could install larger deflector
stones so kids could not relocate them.
Mr. Tambourino noted that the stone wall shouldn’t sink, as it would be
installed on footings. Mr. Biano said
there should be room for trees/greenery, as long as tree root systems were not
too extensive. Mr. Wilson will
investigate for appropriate trees and shrubs; Tri-State will develop a
landscape plan and bid.
Mr. Biano estimated the cost of the block wall system at
approximately $80,000, including the materials, installation and footing for
the wall, and not including any additional elements or the removal of the
gravel bar. Mr. Lombardi said there
should be enough grant funding to cover these costs. Mr. Shaffer asked Tri-State to schedule a meeting to discuss
details and options.
Mr. Shaffer said he would get the fence detail to
Tri-State. Mr. Lombardi said he would
update the Board of Supervisors on the project and the committee’s decisions;
Mr. Jirele suggested the committee put together the final plans and details
before presenting to the Board for their sign-off.
Public Comment: None.
Next
Meeting: The next meeting is scheduled for
May 11, 2004.
On motion
by Mr. Ward and without objection, the meeting was adjourned at 9:00 PM.
Respectfully
submitted,
______________________________
Leslie P.
Dunleavy, Recording Secretary